There was no significant change in abundance or diversity of carabids in arable land over the 42 years covered. Other factors were explored but were not influential. The size of the catch and the number of species adjusted per unit effort were higher in crops with narrow as compared to wide rows. The mean species richness was 7.15 species/(m days)0.25. The number of species was allometrically related to the trapping effort defined as the product of the number of traps, their perimeter and the time of exposure in the field. The total catch was proportional to the number of trap days, with a mean of 1.33 beetles/(trap days). We analysed samples of Carabidae (Coleoptera) from annual crops, reported in 104 publications from Europe and North-America, spanning a period of 42 years, to find (i) a scaling for pitfall trapping effort to assess activity-density and diversity in pitfall catches across studies and, (ii) to determine the sources of variability in the catch per unit effort. It has never been studied how results of pitfall trapping should be standardized to obtain estimates of activity-density and diversity that are comparable across studies. Meta-analysis is a powerful technique to synthesize information across studies, but it requires standardization to make study results comparable. The results give insight in factors affecting carabid abundance and diversity in field studies and enable standardization of pitfall catches across the literature.Ībstract = "Pitfall trapping is widely used for studying the abundance and diversity of ground-dwelling arthropods and small vertebrates. The mean species richness was 7.15 species/(m days) 0.25. Pitfall trapping is widely used for studying the abundance and diversity of ground-dwelling arthropods and small vertebrates.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |